lidarr-on-steroidsvsMusic Assistant
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| lidarr-on-steroids | Music Assistant | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 31 in Music | #3 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 529 | 3 251 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +143 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 45 |
| Latest release | — | 2.11.0b7 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Music Assistant scores 71/100 against 46/100 for lidarr-on-steroids, so it is the safer default.
Music Assistant ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for lidarr-on-steroids.
Music Assistant is growing faster right now (+143 stars in 30 days).
lidarr-on-steroids details →Music Assistant details →
Swap a project
Keep lidarr-on-steroids, compare it with
Keep Music Assistant, compare it with