librephotosvsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| librephotos | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in Photo Management | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 8 120 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +37 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.5.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
librephotos scores 71/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
librephotos ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TypeType.
If you want the quickest setup, librephotos is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
librephotos is growing faster right now (+37 stars in 30 days).
librephotos details →TypeType details →
Swap a project
Keep librephotos, compare it with
Keep TypeType, compare it with