librephotosvsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| librephotos | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 8 118 | 132 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +3 224 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 1462 |
| Latest release | 1.5.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | b11976 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 71/100 for librephotos, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1462 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for librephotos.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 224 stars in 30 days).
librephotos details →llama.cpp details →
Swap a project
Keep librephotos, compare it with
Keep llama.cpp, compare it with