LibationvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 6 376 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 0 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Libation scores 68/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
Libation is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
Libation details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with