LibationvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 6 373 | 117 655 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 | +5 296 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 11 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 296 stars in 30 days).
Libation details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with