LibationvsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 6 376 | 11 122 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 12 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |
Which one should you pick?
SonarQube scores 71/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
If you want the quickest setup, Libation is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
Libation details →SonarQube details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep SonarQube, compare it with