Libationvssandboxed.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | sandboxed.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 6 375 | 673 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +154 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 9 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | C | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Libation scores 68/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for sandboxed.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, Libation is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.
Libation is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).
Libation details →sandboxed.sh details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep sandboxed.sh, compare it with