LibationvsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 6 375 | 35 502 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +1 770 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 5 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
RustFS scores 74/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, Libation is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 770 stars in 30 days).
Libation details →RustFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with