LibationvsPulse
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | Pulse | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 375 | 6 973 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +232 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 43 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Pulse scores 71/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.
Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 33 for Libation.
If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; Libation needs more configuration.
Libation details →Pulse details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep Pulse, compare it with