LibationvsPruneMate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | PruneMate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #5 of 5 in Docker Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 375 | 468 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 10 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | V1.3.3 · 15 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
Libation scores 68/100 against 46/100 for PruneMate, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for PruneMate.
If you want the quickest setup, PruneMate is easier to run; Libation needs more configuration.
Libation is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
Libation details →PruneMate details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep PruneMate, compare it with