LibationvsMikroDash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Libation | MikroDash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 377 | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +156 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 11 |
| Latest release | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.8.78 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Libation scores 68/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for MikroDash.
If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; Libation needs more configuration.
Libation is growing faster right now (+156 stars in 30 days).
Libation details →MikroDash details →
Swap a project
Keep Libation, compare it with
Keep MikroDash, compare it with