laudspeakervsplunk
Two self-hosted Customer.io alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| laudspeaker | plunk | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Customer Engagement | #9 of 106 in Email |
| GitHub stars | 2 630 | 5 555 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +73 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 |
| Latest release | — | v0.17.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
plunk scores 68/100 against 48/100 for laudspeaker, so it is the safer default.
plunk ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for laudspeaker.
If you want the quickest setup, plunk is easier to run; laudspeaker needs more configuration.
plunk is growing faster right now (+73 stars in 30 days).
laudspeaker details →plunk details → All Customer.io alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep laudspeaker, compare it with
Keep plunk, compare it with