Dittofeedvslaudspeaker
Two self-hosted Customer.io alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dittofeed | laudspeaker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Marketing Automation | #2 of 3 in Customer Engagement |
| GitHub stars | 3 026 | 2 630 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Dittofeed scores 60/100 against 48/100 for laudspeaker, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Dittofeed is easier to run; laudspeaker needs more configuration.
Dittofeed is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).
Dittofeed details →laudspeaker details → All Customer.io alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep Dittofeed, compare it with
Keep laudspeaker, compare it with