LanQin EmailvsMail-in-a-Box
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LanQin Email | Mail-in-a-Box | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #77 of 106 in Email | #3 of 16 in Mail Server |
| GitHub stars | 161 | 15 447 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +29 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.2.4 · 28 Oct 2026 | v77 · 26 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | CC0-1.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Mail-in-a-Box scores 72/100 against 46/100 for LanQin Email, so it is the safer default.
LanQin Email ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Mail-in-a-Box.
If you want the quickest setup, Mail-in-a-Box is easier to run; LanQin Email needs more configuration.
Mail-in-a-Box is growing faster right now (+29 stars in 30 days).
LanQin Email details →Mail-in-a-Box details →
Swap a project
Keep LanQin Email, compare it with
Keep Mail-in-a-Box, compare it with