LanLensvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LanLens | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 146 | 114 268 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 559 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 45/100 for LanLens, so it is the safer default.
LanLens ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, LanLens is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 559 stars in 30 days).
LanLens details →supabase details →