LanLensvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LanLens | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 147 | 93 286 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +58 012 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 35 |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 45/100 for LanLens, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for LanLens.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 012 stars in 30 days).
LanLens details →OmniVoice-Studio details →