LanLensvslivekit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LanLens | livekit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #2 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 147 | 21 916 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +817 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 45/100 for LanLens, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for LanLens.
If you want the quickest setup, LanLens is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+817 stars in 30 days).
LanLens details →livekit details →