LangfusevsMaple
Two self-hosted Datadog alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Langfuse | Maple | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 125 in AI | #6 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 36 655 | 1 923 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 672 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 161 | 5 |
| Latest release | v4.71.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.3.0 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Langfuse scores 86/100 against 57/100 for Maple, so it is the safer default.
Langfuse ships more often: 161 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Maple.
If you want the quickest setup, Maple is easier to run; Langfuse needs more configuration.
Langfuse is growing faster right now (+1 672 stars in 30 days).
Langfuse details →Maple details → All Datadog alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep Langfuse, compare it with
Keep Maple, compare it with