langflowvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 156 109 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +918 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+918 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with