langflowvsToolbarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | Toolbarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 6 in Administration |
| GitHub stars | 156 121 | 188 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +899 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 39/100 for Toolbarr, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Toolbarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Toolbarr is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+899 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →Toolbarr details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep Toolbarr, compare it with