langflowvssubarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | subarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #79 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 156 125 | 147 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +903 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.7.24 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 48/100 for subarr, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for subarr.
If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; subarr needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+903 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →subarr details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep subarr, compare it with