langflowvsSemaphore UI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | Semaphore UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 156 112 | 14 334 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +921 | +151 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 73/100 for Semaphore UI, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+921 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →Semaphore UI details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep Semaphore UI, compare it with