langflowvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 156 112 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +921 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
langflow is growing faster right now (+921 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with