langflowvsrunitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | runitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #25 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 156 117 | 361 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +926 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.4.1-build.6 · 17 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | 0BSD |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 49/100 for runitor, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for runitor.
If you want the quickest setup, runitor is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+926 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →runitor details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep runitor, compare it with