langflowvsrudderstack
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | rudderstack | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 156 115 | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +924 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 39 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 63/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for langflow.
If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+924 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →rudderstack details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep rudderstack, compare it with