langflowvsRapidForge
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | RapidForge | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 37/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #27 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 156 112 | 44 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +921 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.15.0 · 2 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 37/100 for RapidForge, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for RapidForge.
If you want the quickest setup, RapidForge is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+921 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →RapidForge details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep RapidForge, compare it with