langflowvsOpenWA
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | OpenWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 19 in API Management |
| GitHub stars | 156 105 | 16 340 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +914 | +334 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.26.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 77/100 for OpenWA, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for OpenWA.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenWA is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+914 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →OpenWA details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep OpenWA, compare it with