langflowvsOpen Terminal
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | Open Terminal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #51 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 156 112 | 3 444 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +921 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.14.6 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 60/100 for Open Terminal, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Open Terminal.
If you want the quickest setup, Open Terminal is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+921 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →Open Terminal details →All AI Agents projects →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep Open Terminal, compare it with