langflowvslivekit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | livekit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 156 109 | 21 895 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +918 | +820 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 80/100 for livekit, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for livekit.
If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
langflow details →livekit details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep livekit, compare it with