LabTethervsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LabTether | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 233 | 56 876 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +147 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 17 Apr 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 51/100 for LabTether, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; LabTether needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+147 stars in 30 days).
LabTether details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep LabTether, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with