LabTethervsOpenList
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LabTether | OpenList | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #2 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 233 | 25 326 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +568 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 17 Apr 2026 | v4.2.9 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OpenList scores 80/100 against 51/100 for LabTether, so it is the safer default.
OpenList ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for LabTether.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenList is easier to run; LabTether needs more configuration.
OpenList is growing faster right now (+568 stars in 30 days).
LabTether details →OpenList details →
Swap a project
Keep LabTether, compare it with
Keep OpenList, compare it with