LabTethervsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LabTether | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 233 | 393 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 876 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 37 |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 17 Apr 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 51/100 for LabTether, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for LabTether.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 876 stars in 30 days).
LabTether details →openclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep LabTether, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with