LabTethervsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LabTether | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 233 | 132 674 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 317 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 1461 |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 17 Apr 2026 | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 51/100 for LabTether, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for LabTether.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 317 stars in 30 days).
LabTether details →llama.cpp details →
Swap a project
Keep LabTether, compare it with
Keep llama.cpp, compare it with