LabTethervslivekit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LabTether | livekit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #2 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 233 | 21 913 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +814 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 17 Apr 2026 | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 51/100 for LabTether, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for LabTether.
If you want the quickest setup, LabTether is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+814 stars in 30 days).
LabTether details →livekit details →
Swap a project
Keep LabTether, compare it with
Keep livekit, compare it with