Kulavssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kula | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 338 | 114 248 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 539 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 8 |
| Latest release | 0.21.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 55/100 for Kula, so it is the safer default.
Kula ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, Kula is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 539 stars in 30 days).
Kula details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep Kula, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with