Kulavsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kula | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 1 338 | 65 370 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +316 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 15 |
| Latest release | 0.21.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 55/100 for Kula, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Kula.
If you want the quickest setup, Kula is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+316 stars in 30 days).
Kula details →nocodb details →
Swap a project
Keep Kula, compare it with
Keep nocodb, compare it with