Kong Gatewayvstrusted-cgi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kong Gateway | trusted-cgi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 39 in API Gateway | #4 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 44 314 | 249 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +128 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Lua | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Kong Gateway scores 82/100 against 45/100 for trusted-cgi, so it is the safer default.
Kong Gateway ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for trusted-cgi.
If you want the quickest setup, trusted-cgi is easier to run; Kong Gateway needs more configuration.
Kong Gateway is growing faster right now (+128 stars in 30 days).
Kong Gateway details →trusted-cgi details →