Kong GatewayvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kong Gateway | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 39 in API Gateway | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 44 314 | 117 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +128 | +5 391 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Lua | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 82/100 for Kong Gateway, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kong Gateway.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).
Kong Gateway details →TradingAgents details →