Kong Gatewayvsquik
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kong Gateway | quik | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 39 in API Gateway | #23 of 25 in Video Conferencing |
| GitHub stars | 44 317 | 193 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +131 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Lua | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Kong Gateway scores 82/100 against 39/100 for quik, so it is the safer default.
Kong Gateway ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for quik.
If you want the quickest setup, quik is easier to run; Kong Gateway needs more configuration.
Kong Gateway is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).
Kong Gateway details →quik details →