Kokoro FastAPIvsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kokoro FastAPI | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 5 612 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +135 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 39 |
| Latest release | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Kokoro FastAPI scores 69/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Kokoro FastAPI.
If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+135 stars in 30 days).
Kokoro FastAPI details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep Kokoro FastAPI, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with