OpenReadervsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenReader | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 39 |
| Latest release | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
storj scores 61/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for OpenReader.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
OpenReader is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).
OpenReader details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenReader, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with