Kokoro FastAPIvsQFieldCloud
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kokoro FastAPI | QFieldCloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 5 608 | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +133 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Kokoro FastAPI scores 69/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.
Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QFieldCloud.
If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.
Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+133 stars in 30 days).
Kokoro FastAPI details →QFieldCloud details →
Swap a project
Keep Kokoro FastAPI, compare it with
Keep QFieldCloud, compare it with