Fish SpeechvsQFieldCloud
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | QFieldCloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 33 457 | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +134 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.
QFieldCloud ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →QFieldCloud details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep QFieldCloud, compare it with