keycloakvspikvm
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| keycloak | pikvm | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Authentication | #3 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 37 581 | 10 424 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +614 | +71 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 0 |
| Latest release | 26.8.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | — |
Which one should you pick?
keycloak scores 86/100 against 72/100 for pikvm, so it is the safer default.
keycloak ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for pikvm.
If you want the quickest setup, keycloak is easier to run; pikvm needs more configuration.
keycloak is growing faster right now (+614 stars in 30 days).
keycloak details →pikvm details →
Swap a project
Keep keycloak, compare it with
Keep pikvm, compare it with