keycloakvsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| keycloak | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 40 in Authentication | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 37 573 | 132 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +606 | +3 271 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 1456 |
| Latest release | 26.8.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | b11966 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 86/100 for keycloak, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1456 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for keycloak.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 271 stars in 30 days).
keycloak details →llama.cpp details →
Swap a project
Keep keycloak, compare it with
Keep llama.cpp, compare it with