KestravsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kestra | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 30 053 | 470 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 737 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 59 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.11.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Kestra scores 82/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for TypeType.
If you want the quickest setup, Kestra is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 737 stars in 30 days).
Kestra details →TypeType details →
Swap a project
Keep Kestra, compare it with
Keep TypeType, compare it with