KestravsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kestra | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 30 053 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 737 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 59 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Kestra scores 82/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 737 stars in 30 days).
Kestra details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep Kestra, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with