KestravsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kestra | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 30 053 | 35 507 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 718 | +1 675 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 59 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Kestra scores 82/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, Kestra is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
Kestra details →RustFS details →