KestravsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kestra | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 30 050 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 734 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 59 | 21 |
| Latest release | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Kestra scores 82/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for ReadMeABook.
If you want the quickest setup, Kestra is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 734 stars in 30 days).
Kestra details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep Kestra, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with