KestravsOpenBrief
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kestra | OpenBrief | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #7 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 30 059 | 580 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 724 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 59 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.4.0 · 25 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Kestra scores 82/100 against 45/100 for OpenBrief, so it is the safer default.
Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenBrief.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenBrief is easier to run; Kestra needs more configuration.
Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 724 stars in 30 days).
Kestra details →OpenBrief details →